A strategic plan offers a library a comprehensive roadmap for its long-term success, giving it the foresight needed to navigate the complexities of constantly shifting operational contexts. With a clear vision of the future, strategic plans can encourage a sense of unity and purpose among employees and departments, working together towards a shared mission. Also, strategic planning takes into account the library's human and financial resources, competitive environment, and stakeholder expectations, fostering a holistic approach that ensures no aspect is left unconsidered.
However, strategic plans can also be somewhat rigid, making it difficult for the library to quickly adapt to unexpected changes or seize emerging opportunities. Additionally, the process of developing a detailed strategic plan can be time-consuming and resource-intensive, and translating it into actionable steps can pose a significant challenge, leading to a potential gap between strategy and execution. This is commonly shared complaint that leaders and staff alike have about these plans.
On the other hand, OKRs offer a more agile and focused approach to goal setting, enabling libraries to respond swiftly to the challenges and opportunities around them. By emphasizing a smaller number of high-impact, relatable objectives and measurable key results, OKRs ensure that teams remain focused on what matters most -- fostering a culture of accountability and performance measurement.
Nevertheless, OKRs have their own limitations. With their inherently shorter time frames, they can sometimes lead to a myopic focus on short-term results at the expense of long-term strategy. Furthermore, without a comprehensive strategic plan in place, OKRs may not be fully aligned with the organization's overarching goals and mission. Lastly, OKRs might not address all aspects of the organization, potentially leaving gaps in planning and execution that could undermine fulfilling the broader mission and vision.